"Bandit" (2bandit) 01/13/2015 at 20:00 • Filed to: None

25

10

 > Bandit 01/13/2015 at 20:08

1

GT with a V6, still faster than a Vette.

ly2v8-Brian > Bandit 01/13/2015 at 20:09

4

bre92ser > Bandit 01/13/2015 at 20:19

0

I just cant figure out why they would retain the EcoBoost name putting it in the GT, though I guess they call the Daytona Prototype engine an EcoBoost, too.... Maybe thats it?

It just sounds so lackluster, even at 600 HP.

Saracen > Bandit 01/13/2015 at 20:24

0

Actually, it's to satisfy the 4 liter displacement limit for the World Endurance Championship.

http://blackflag.jalopnik.com/surprise-surpr…

Sam >  01/13/2015 at 20:28

1

I'd expect a car with twin turbos, that costs nearly 3 times as much, to be faster.

 > Sam 01/13/2015 at 20:30

0

Did Ford already release GT pricing?

Sam >  01/13/2015 at 20:34

0

I'm estimating it'll be above the 200k mark. The original started at 140k in 2004 dollars, though they sold for nearly 250k when they were first launched after dealer markup.

 > Sam 01/13/2015 at 20:36

0

Oh well, still faster than a Vette.

Sam >  01/13/2015 at 20:37

0

Well yeah, a lot of things are.

 > Sam 01/13/2015 at 20:38

0

Yea, like a Hellcat that costs less and weights more and seats 5.